PARAFAC Abnormality solution
PARAFAC Analysis results from Stephen et al., 2016 (STE) PARAFAC Analysis results from Zhou et al., 2016 (JGLR) PARAFAC Analysis results from Xu and Guo., 2016 (WR)
Abnormality: abrupt decline of some peaks
Compared with literatures
Walker et al. 2013
Stedmon & Markager 2005
Stedmon et al 2003
Hypothesis: Cut EEMs improperly
FirstOrderCut = [-40 15];
SecondOrderCut = [-40 15];
InsertedData = [NaN 0];
for i = 1:2
if FirstOrderCut(i) ~= NaN
for j = 1: length(Ex)
k = find (Em<Ex(j)-FirstOrderCut(i));
X(:,k,j) = InsertedData(i);
end
end
if SecondOrderCut (i) ~= NaN
for j = 1:length(Ex)
k = find (Em>Ex(j)*2.05+SecondOrderCut(i));
X(:,k,j) = InsertedData(i);
end
end
end
Demostration:
Solution:
InsertedData = [NaN NaN]
Results:
Introduction of samples
Samples:
Yukon River downstream
Sampling time:
2004-2005
Sample categories:
colloidal organic matter (>1kDa), low molecular weight organic matter (<1kDa), dissolved organic matter (<0.45e-6 m)
Before program revised:
3 components decomposed by PARAFAC program:
4 components from PARAFAC:
After revised:
3 components decomposed by PARAFAC program:
4 components from PARAFAC:
Comparison
Component | before program revised | After revised | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Excitation (nm) | Emission (nm) | Excitation (nm) | Emission (nm) | |
3Components | ||||
C1 | 280 | 485 | 260 | 480 |
C2 | 250 | 480 | 250 | 420 |
C3 | 220 | 405 | <250 | 330 |
4Components | ||||
C1 | 230 | 450 | 250 | 420 |
C2 | 310 | 410 | 270 | 500 |
C3 | 385 | 480 | 260/375 | 480 |
C4 | <220 | 380 | <250 | 330 |