PARAFAC Analysis results from Stephen et al., 2016 (STE) PARAFAC Analysis results from Zhou et al., 2016 (JGLR) PARAFAC Analysis results from Xu and Guo., 2016 (WR)

Abnormality: abrupt decline of some peaks

Compared with literatures

Walker et al. 2013

Stedmon & Markager 2005

Stedmon et al 2003

Hypothesis: Cut EEMs improperly

FirstOrderCut = [-40 15];
SecondOrderCut = [-40 15];
InsertedData = [NaN 0];
for i = 1:2
    if FirstOrderCut(i) ~= NaN
        for j = 1: length(Ex)
            k = find (Em<Ex(j)-FirstOrderCut(i));
            X(:,k,j) = InsertedData(i);
        end
    end
    if SecondOrderCut (i) ~= NaN
        for j = 1:length(Ex)
            k = find (Em>Ex(j)*2.05+SecondOrderCut(i));
            X(:,k,j) = InsertedData(i);
        end
    end
end

Demostration:

Solution:

InsertedData = [NaN NaN]

Results:

Introduction of samples

Samples:

Yukon River downstream

Sampling time:

2004-2005

Sample categories:

colloidal organic matter (>1kDa), low molecular weight organic matter (<1kDa), dissolved organic matter (<0.45e-6 m)

Before program revised:

3 components decomposed by PARAFAC program:

4 components from PARAFAC:

After revised:

3 components decomposed by PARAFAC program:

4 components from PARAFAC:

Comparison

Component before program revised   After revised  
  Excitation (nm) Emission (nm) Excitation (nm) Emission (nm)
3Components        
C1 280 485 260 480
C2 250 480 250 420
C3 220 405 <250 330
4Components        
C1 230 450 250 420
C2 310 410 270 500
C3 385 480 260/375 480
C4 <220 380 <250 330